Marianne Doury, 16 May 2017, 10h

May 16, 2017

ArgLab Research Colloquium

Av. de Berna 26, I&D Building, First floor, room 1.05

 

The argumentative reference to the rule of justice in reactions to the 2015 terrorist attacks in France

Marianne Doury, CNRS/Université Paris 10-Nanterre, France

 

This presentation will focus on arguments based on an appeal to the rule of justice (according to which cases falling within the same category must be treated in a similar way, Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca 1958). The appeal is present massively in the comments that followed the terrorist attacks (and centrally, the attack against Charlie Hebdo and the kosher supermarket) that struck France since January 2015. These arguments, although based on a common principle, may be distinguished according to the groups of speakers who mobilize them as well as according to the conclusions they support:

-          If it had been the seat of Valeurs Actuelles [a very right-handed French Newspaper] that had been attacked rather than that of Charlie Hebdo, there would not have been such massive public reactions! [[http://lesalonbeige.blogs.com]

-          On the injunctions addressed to the Muslim community to officially dissociate from the attacks: "When the Ku Klux Klan attacks black people, nobody asks all white people to dissociate themselves from their deeds" [Facebook]

-          "When one criticizes a Jew, it is called anti-Semitism, when one criticizes a Muslim, it is called freedom of expression" [Facebook]

I will identify some of the discursive markers that are currently associated with such appeals to the rule of justice. I will then try and distinguish two different variants of these arguments appealing to the rule of justice according to the argumentative line they contribute to elaborate. I will then suggest that such discourses are indicative of the tensions that currently pervading French society.

Back to previous page


Events

All Events

Steven Gouveia, 13 December 2017, 16h

Steven Gouveia presents A Neurophilosophical Account of Perception The Mind…

December 13, 2017

Andri Christodoulou, 11 Dec 2017, 16h30

ArgLab Research Colloquium | "Using argumentation as a tool for…

December 11, 2017

Elisabetta Montanari, 27 Nov 2017, 16h

ArgLab Research Colloquium | "Learning Consistency Via Argumentation"

November 27, 2017

Dina Mendonça, Fr 27 Nov 17 Sala 606 TB, 16h

Dina Mendonça on the Role of Reflexivity and Meta-Emotions in…

November 24, 2017

Klaus Gaertner, 15 November 2017, 16h

Klaus Gartner RIP Mind & Cognition Seminar, The Dynamics of…

November 15, 2017

Fabrizio Macagno, 13 November 2017, 16h

ArgLab Research Colloquium | "Evidence for misunderstandings"

November 13, 2017

Conference on Value Disagreement

VDC-2017: International Conference on Value Disagreement @IFILNOVA

November 09, 2017

Assimakis Tseronis, 16 October 2017, 16h

ArgLab Research Colloquium | "Multimodal Argumentation: Building Bridges between Argumentation…

October 16, 2017

Andrés Soria Ruiz, 13th October 2017, 11h

Talk by Andrés Soria Ruiz, Institut Nicod | Fr. 13.10.2017…

October 13, 2017

Workshop on Legal evidence and argumentation

The workshop aims at exploring the notion of expert-based evidence…

October 11, 2017

RIP Seminar with Rob Clowes, 4th October 2017 at 16h.

Mind & Cognition RIP Seminar on Material Agency and Strong…

October 04, 2017

Marcin Lewiński, 2 October 2017, 16h

ArgLab Research Colloquium | "Disagreeing, misunderstanding and strawmanning"

October 02, 2017

Institutions

IFIL FCSH/NOVA
Faculdade de Direito Universidade Nova de Lisboa
FCSH
UNL
FCT