ArgLab Research Colloquium
Av. de Berna 26, Edifício ID, Sala 1.06
Meta-Emotions and Argumentation: some effects for Decision and Action
Dina Mendoça, IFL - Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Emotions are commonly present in Argumentation (Walton 2002). Research on emotion has revealed that the presence of emotion is not always as straightforward as the clear and compact names we have for them and that emotions may sometimes mask other emotional realities (Pugmire 1994) making it harder to address and regulate the emotional aspect of argumentation for decision and action. In addition, differences in meta-emotion may also be at the base of misunderstandings and disputes (Jones & Botker, 2001, p. 240) and complicate matters even further. This article discusses the way in which unconscious emotions (Winkielman & Berridge 2004) and meta-emotions (Mendonça 2013) appear in argumentation.
The first part describes the nature and scope of both meta-emotions and unconscious emotions showing how both are deeply connected to or values and show how they turn argumentation and communication more opaque. Arguing that the fact that both meta-emotions and unconscious emotions can be seen as the result of education and emotion regulation. Consequently, both unconscious emotions and meta-emotions render decision and action harder because people are less aware of them, and they also assume that others have similar emotional processes for these are culturally determined, and mirror our values and beliefs about emotions. Finally, the first part indicates how conflict is a tool for bringing to the surface our deepest emotions and important to better understand them.
The second part looks at how the emotions of surprise, shock, and awe may provide ways to both help and aggravate argumentation by looking to how it can interfere with other emotional experiences. Finally, the article offers a practical analysis of the arguments around the law forbidding students to wear visible religious signs in public schools (Jones 2012) to show how theoretical exploration done can be useful for understanding and analyzing argumentation in general.
Bartsch, A., Vorderer, P., Mangold, R., & Viehoff, R. (2008). Appraisal of emotions in media use: Toward a process model of meta-emotion and emotion regulation. Media Psychology, 11:1, 7–27.
Brink, David O. “Prudence and Authenticity: Interpersonal Conflicts of Value” The Philosophical Review, Vol. 112, No. 2, (April 2003) pp. 215-245.
De Sousa, R. (1990). Emotions, education and time. Metaphilosophy, 21, 434–446.
De Sousa, R. (2007). Truth, authenticity, and rationality. Dialectica, 61:3, 323–334.
Jäger, C., & Bartsch, A. (2006). Meta-emotions. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 73, 179–204.
Jones, T., & Bodtker, A. (2001). In theory mediating with heart in mind: Addressing emotion in mediation practice. Negotiating Journal, 3, 217–244.
Jones, Kicky (2012) “Justice must be seen to be done: organizational Justice and the Headscarf and burqa laws of France. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, Volume 17 (2), 18-28
Mayer, J. D., & Gaschke, Y. N. (1988). The experience and meta-experience of mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55:1, 102–111.
Mendonça, Dina (2013) “Emotions about Emotions” Emotion Review vol.5, No.4 (October) 1-7
Mo¨ısi, D. (2007). The clash of emotions: Fear, humiliation, hope, and the new world order. Foreign Affairs, 86, 8–12.
Pugmire, David. (1994) “Real Emotion” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. LIV, No. 1, March, pp. 105-122
--- . (2005) Sound Sentiments. Integrity in the emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Salema, M. (2005). What is emotional authenticity? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35:3, 209–230.
Shapiro, Daniel L. (2002). "Negotiating Emotions," in Conflict Resolution Quarterly, (20:1), 68.
Tracy, J.L. & Robins, R.W. (2007) “Self-conscious emotions: Where self and emotion meet” The self in social psychology. Fronteirs of social psychology series (Eds. Sedikides & Spence) New York: Psychology Press, pp. 187-209)
Van Kleef, G. A., C. K. W. De Dreu, D. Pietroni, and A. S. R. Manstead (2006), 'Power and emotion in negotiations: Power moderates the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on concession making', European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 557-581.
Van Kleef, G. A. and S. Côté (2007), 'Expressing anger in conflict: When it helps and when it hurts', Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1557-1569.
Walton, Douglas. (2002) The Place of Emotion in Argument, Pensylvania: Penn State University Press.
Winkielman, Piotr; & Berridge, Kent C. (2004) “Unconscious Emotion” Current Directions in Psychological Science, volume 13-number 3, pp. 120-123.
2nd ERB Project Workshop
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Why the Situated…
ArgLab Research Colloquium | Friendly Sensorimotor Generalists
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Transparency in Extended…
ArgLab Research Colloquium | Dehumanization and the Question of Animals
ArgLab Research Colloquium | Pragmatic functions of gesture on different…
ArgLab Research Colloquium | The role of trust in argumentation
ERB Masterclass 2020
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | A situated approach…
ArgLab Research Colloquium | Philosophy for Children and the Socratic…
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | The Structure of…
THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON THE DISCURSIVE MANAGEMENT OF POLITICAL DISAGREEMENT
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Interpersonal communication and…
ArgLab Research Colloquium | Conceptual Engineering: Under our Control?
ArgLab Research Colloquium | "Discursive depoliticisation: From argumentation to explanation"
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Wittgenstein, Buddhism, and…
ArgLab Research Colloquium | "More than words: Worldmaking and stancetaking…