EN PT

Dina Mendoça, 6 March 2014, 11:00

April 06, 2014

ArgLab Research Colloquium

Av. de Berna 26, Edifício ID, Sala 1.06

 

Meta-Emotions and Argumentation: some effects for Decision and Action

Dina Mendoça, IFL - Universidade Nova de Lisboa

 

Abstract

Emotions are commonly present in Argumentation (Walton 2002). Research on emotion has revealed that the presence of emotion is not always as straightforward as the clear and compact names we have for them and that emotions may sometimes mask other emotional realities (Pugmire 1994) making it harder to address and regulate the emotional aspect of argumentation for decision and action. In addition, differences in meta-emotion may also be at the base of misunderstandings and disputes (Jones & Botker, 2001, p. 240) and complicate matters even further. This article discusses the way in which unconscious emotions (Winkielman & Berridge 2004) and meta-emotions (Mendonça 2013) appear in argumentation.

The first part describes the nature and scope of both meta-emotions and unconscious emotions showing how both are deeply connected to or values and show how they turn argumentation and communication more opaque. Arguing that the fact that both meta-emotions and unconscious emotions can be seen as the result of education and emotion regulation. Consequently, both unconscious emotions and meta-emotions render decision and action harder because people are less aware of them, and they also assume that others have similar emotional processes for these are culturally determined, and mirror our values and beliefs about emotions. Finally, the first part indicates how conflict is a tool for bringing to the surface our deepest emotions and important to better understand them.

The second part looks at how the emotions of surprise, shock, and awe may provide ways to both help and aggravate argumentation by looking to how it can interfere with other emotional experiences. Finally, the article offers a practical analysis of the arguments around the law forbidding students to wear visible religious signs in public schools (Jones 2012) to show how theoretical exploration done can be useful for understanding and analyzing argumentation in general.

 

References

Bartsch, A., Vorderer, P., Mangold, R., & Viehoff, R. (2008). Appraisal of emotions in media use: Toward a process model of meta-emotion and emotion regulation. Media Psychology, 11:1, 7–27.

Brink, David O. “Prudence and Authenticity: Interpersonal Conflicts of Value” The Philosophical Review, Vol. 112, No. 2, (April 2003) pp. 215-245.

De Sousa, R. (1990). Emotions, education and time. Metaphilosophy, 21, 434–446.

De Sousa, R. (2007). Truth, authenticity, and rationality. Dialectica, 61:3, 323–334.

Jäger, C., & Bartsch, A. (2006). Meta-emotions. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 73, 179–204.

Jones, T., & Bodtker, A. (2001). In theory mediating with heart in mind: Addressing emotion in mediation practice. Negotiating Journal, 3, 217–244.

Jones, Kicky (2012) “Justice must be seen to be done: organizational Justice and the Headscarf and burqa laws of France. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, Volume 17 (2), 18-28

Mayer, J. D., & Gaschke, Y. N. (1988). The experience and meta-experience of mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55:1, 102–111.

Mendonça, Dina (2013) “Emotions about Emotions” Emotion Review vol.5, No.4 (October) 1-7

Mo¨ısi, D. (2007). The clash of emotions: Fear, humiliation, hope, and the new world order. Foreign Affairs, 86, 8–12.

Pugmire, David. (1994) “Real Emotion” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. LIV, No. 1, March, pp. 105-122

--- . (2005) Sound Sentiments. Integrity in the emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Salema, M. (2005). What is emotional authenticity? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35:3, 209–230.

Shapiro, Daniel L. (2002). "Negotiating Emotions," in Conflict Resolution Quarterly, (20:1), 68.

Tracy, J.L. & Robins, R.W. (2007) “Self-conscious emotions: Where self and emotion meet” The self in social psychology. Fronteirs of social psychology series (Eds. Sedikides & Spence) New York: Psychology Press, pp. 187-209)

Van Kleef, G. A., C. K. W. De Dreu, D. Pietroni, and A. S. R. Manstead (2006), 'Power and emotion in negotiations: Power moderates the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on concession making', European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 557-581.

Van Kleef, G. A. and S. Côté (2007), 'Expressing anger in conflict: When it helps and when it hurts', Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1557-1569.

Walton, Douglas. (2002) The Place of Emotion in Argument, Pensylvania: Penn State University Press.

Winkielman, Piotr; & Berridge, Kent C. (2004) “Unconscious Emotion” Current Directions in Psychological Science, volume 13-number 3, pp. 120-123.

Back to previous page


Events

All Events

2nd ERB Project Workshop: Wittgenstein, Nature, and Religion

2nd ERB Project Workshop

July 29, 2020

Dina Mendonça 8 July, 2020

Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Why the Situated…

July 08, 2020

Dave Ward, 12 June 2020, 11h

ArgLab Research Colloquium | Friendly Sensorimotor Generalists

June 12, 2020

Gloria Andrada (w/Robert Clowes), 3 June, 2020, 15.00h to 16.00h

Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Transparency in Extended…

June 02, 2020

Alice Crary, 8 May 2020, 11h

ArgLab Research Colloquium | Dehumanization and the Question of Animals

May 08, 2020

Alan Cienki, 17 April 2020, 11h

ArgLab Research Colloquium | Pragmatic functions of gesture on different…

April 17, 2020

Catarina Dutilh Novaes, 13 March 2020, 11h

ArgLab Research Colloquium | The role of trust in argumentation

March 13, 2020

Two-day Masterclass on Wittgenstein’s Epistemology of Religion

ERB Masterclass 2020

February 26, 2020

Fabrizia Garavaglia, 19 February, 2020, 12.00h to 13.00h

Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | A situated approach…

February 19, 2020

Florian Franken Figueiredo, 14 Feb 2020, 11h

ArgLab Research Colloquium | Philosophy for Children and the Socratic…

February 14, 2020

Abraham Sapién, 22 January, 2020, 12.00h to 13.00

Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | The Structure of…

January 22, 2020

DISARGUE Workshop 19-20 Dec 2019

THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON THE DISCURSIVE MANAGEMENT OF POLITICAL DISAGREEMENT

December 19, 2019

Hili Razinsky, 11 December, 2019, 12.00h to 13.00h

Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Interpersonal communication and…

December 11, 2019

Herman Cappelen, 6 December 2019, 11h

ArgLab Research Colloquium | Conceptual Engineering: Under our Control?

December 06, 2019

Dima Mohammed, 15 Nov 2019, 11h

ArgLab Research Colloquium | "Discursive depoliticisation: From argumentation to explanation"

November 15, 2019

Rob Vinten, 6 Nov, 2019, 12.00h to 13.00h

Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Wittgenstein, Buddhism, and…

November 06, 2019

Vito Evola, 11 October 2019, 11h

ArgLab Research Colloquium | "More than words: Worldmaking and stancetaking…

October 11, 2019

Institutions

IFIL FCSH/NOVA
Faculdade de Direito Universidade Nova de Lisboa
FCSH
UNL
FCT